![]() |
Welcome to the ATSIP Discussion Board! If you are an ATSIP member, you have already been registered! Your username is your first initial and last name (IE: John Doe = jdoe), your password is the same that you use to log in to the membership site. |
2.2 Definitions Land Ways, Land Vehicles and Users |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Author | |
jmcdonough ![]() ATSIP Member ![]() ANSI D16 Panel Member Joined: Mar/29/2016 Location: Pennsylvania Status: Offline Points: 15 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I suggest two items be considered within this section under the definition of 2.2.9
Motorcycle.
1) D16 should address "autocycles" to be in alignment with MMUCC as this term is currently being addressed for MMUCC's 5th edtion. 2) D16 could also possibly consider an inclusion under motorcycle for "Motorcycle
conversion kits". These kits modify a two-wheeled motorcyle into what in appeance is a 3-wheeled motorcycle yet the removable conversion puts 4 wheels in contact with the ground thus causing classification questions with respect to this definintion. Modification of the definition for 2.2.9 Motorcycle may also affect inclusions, exclusions, and examples under 2.2.9.1 Motor-driven cycle, 2.2.9.2 Large
motorcycle, 2.2.9.3 speed-limited motor-driven cycle, 2.2.9.4 moped), 2.2.12
automobile, 3.12 Motorcycle Classification by Type.
|
|
![]() |
|
jmcdonough ![]() ATSIP Member ![]() ANSI D16 Panel Member Joined: Mar/29/2016 Location: Pennsylvania Status: Offline Points: 15 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I propose that 2.2.45 Bicycle Lane should be updated to match work done to align MMUCC 4th edition with current applicable definitions. Changes are shown below.
2.2.45 Bicycle Lane: A bicycle lane is a bikeway which (1) is
contiguous with a parallel roadway and (2) has been designated for preferential
or exclusive use by pedalcycles. MMUCC: A bikeway adjacent to travel lanes which has been
designated for preferential or exclusive use by pedalcyclists through striping,
signage or pavement markings. |
|
![]() |
|
jvecchi ![]() ATSIP Fellow ![]() ![]() ANSI D16 Panel Moderator Joined: Mar/29/2016 Location: Colorado Status: Offline Points: 41 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I will include these changes for discussion. Thank you.
|
|
Joan vecchi,
Project Manager |
|
![]() |
|
mmcdonald ![]() ATSIP Member ![]() ANSI D16 Panel Member Joined: Apr/22/2016 Location: Wilmington DE Status: Offline Points: 21 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
John's clarification now makes sense to me, but this really should be "fixed" so the same misinterpretation or confusion does not occur to those who are not as familiar with the subject or how it evolved to where it is currently.
|
|
Michael McDonald
ANSI D16 Panel Member Delaware State Police Director, Information Technology 302-672-5444 |
|
![]() |
|
jdolan ![]() ATSIP Member ![]() ANSI D16 Panel Member Joined: Mar/29/2016 Location: Tennessee Status: Offline Points: 22 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Agreed. I do not believe this is a problem. If the data model conforms to the current classification scheme, then these persons can be easily identified regardless. Also, this could result in persons who are not involved in a transport accident under 2.4.9 (which is inclusive of Definition 2.4.12) as being classified as "motorists."
|
|
![]() |
|
jdolan ![]() ATSIP Member ![]() ANSI D16 Panel Member Joined: Mar/29/2016 Location: Tennessee Status: Offline Points: 22 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think these definitions are already nearly the same. I am in favor of adopting identical language for all standards that address this definition.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |