Reply To: 2.4 Definitions – Accidents

Homepage Forums Reply To: 2.4 Definitions – Accidents

#1659
kaitlan
Keymaster
Posted: May/12/2016 at 3:44pm – author: seymourstern

2.4.4 unstabilized situation

 

Example 9.) A motor vehicle in-transport brakes, attempting to avoid a pedestrian crossing the roadway. The motor vehicle in-transport strikes the pedestrian. At the same time (i.e., when the first vehicle started to brake and before it came to rest), a second motor vehicle in-transport swerves to avoid a collision with the braking vehicle, striking a utility pole. The two motor vehicles in-transport do not strike each other, but these events are all within one unstabilized situation.

 

Under 2.4.4, unstabilized situation, example 9.) describes a situation where two vehicles have no mutual contact yet are part of one unstabilized situation. However, no other crash component (another traffic unit) is not given the same consideration.  If we replace a bicyclist with the second motor vehicle described in “Example 9.)” with the same outcome resulting, the bicyclist is normally not considered part of the crash.

 

This is not described in D16. I have mixed feelings about expanding this to other types of traffic units, however the only other conclusion is to eliminate the described example and therefore require some contact between traffic units in a crash.

 

Scroll to Top
Please include the time the issue happend (with timezone), what you did to trigger the error (ex: what link you clicked on, or did it happen on page load? etc.)
Please attach a screenshot of the problem/error (if any)